Landscape as place

 

 

The nostalgic power of landscapes continues to hold billions of people in an unrelenting grip. We are all born into natural and cultural environments that shape what we become, individually and collectively. From our "mother tongue" to our father's faith, from medical risks to natural hazards, the place where we start our journey has much to do with our destiny, and thus with our chances of overcoming the obstacles in our way.  In this respect, the power of landscape is expressed as memories unassailably attached to our first home surroundings and subsequently it may be transferred to other landscapes to which we become addicted for our holidays.

 

'Landscape', 'landscape-specific thinking', and 'landscape-making' are not new concepts in contemporary practice, but terms such as site, space, place and landscape are often used interchangeably. Philosophers throughout time have wrestled with the concept of landscape before the term was invented when trying to define the nature and extents of our spatial existence.  So it seems presumptuous to assume that the elements of 'landscape' would be the same for everyone.

 

In trying to define our place in space, it is essential to comprehend that the body's relationship to landscape exists on several levels including the physical and the cerebral as well as individual perception and perspective in relationship to other objects . Yet, landscape is not defined merely by a person's physical and psychological relationship to space. Landscape is also a compilation of an individual's cultural and emotional connection to a particular space. While exploration of the physical and analytical need for humans to develop a relationship to space helps to define the power and necessity of landscape as a concept, it is the cultural and emotional needs that form the foundation for understanding that creates a sense of landscape. To paraphrase the contemporary philosopher Edward Burtynsky,

 

"We do not live in space. Instead, we live in landscapes. So it behoves us to understand what such landscape-bound and landscape-specific living consists in. However lost we may become by gliding rapidly between landscapes, and however much we may prefer to think of what happens in a landscape rather than of landscape itself, we are tied to landscape undetachably and without reprieve."

 

Our emotional and sometimes idealistic attachments create values for aspects of landscape through our personal memories and associations. Yi-Fu Tuan, a geographer who is often referred to as one of the founders of humanist geography, refers to such attachments to landscape as topophilia, or love of a landscape, which he defines as the relations, perceptions, attitudes, values and world-view that effectively bond people to place. Each individual relates to the environment around them in varying ways, with differing intensity, and these bonds and connections derive from different sources. Yet, at the most basic level, we learn to love what has become familiar. This phenomenology of landscape can be expanded to a cultural level when the attitudes, views, and values become a collection of shared social references and beliefs. Moving out from the individual to the community, which functions as an emotional and analytical collective, value can be landscaped on specific locations that hold significance for groups of people. This is particularly true of the otherworldliness of standing stones in the British southern downland, which was such a magnet for artists such as Paul Nash.


 

Market place; Ruthin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This Web Page Created with PageBreeze Free HTML Editor